[English]
作者:
fuyuncat
来源:
www.HelloDBA.com
SQL优化器(SQL Tuning Advisor STA)是Oracle10g中推出的帮助DBA优化工具,它的特点是简单、智能,DBA值需要调用函数就可以给出一个性能很差的语句的优化结果。下面介绍一下它的使用。
使用STA一定要保证优化器是CBO模式下。
一、利用STA优化语句
对于问题语句的收集,可以通过Oracle10g的另一个自动化工具:数据库自动诊断监视工具(ADDM)。它的使用可以参照我的另一篇文章《Oracle10g数据库自动诊断监视工具(ADDM)使用指南》。
我们下面简单介绍一下如何优化一条找到的问题语句。正如前面所述说的,STA是用起来很简单(只要你会调用存储过程,都能使用这个工具),三个步骤就可以完成一次语句调优。
测试环境创建:
SQL> CREATE TABLE bigtab AS SELECT rownum as "id", a.* FROM dba_objects a;Table created.
SQL> create table smalltab as select rownum as "id", a.* FROM dba_tables a;Table created.SQL> ALTER TABLE bigtab MODIFY (empno NUMBER);Table altered.
SQL> DECLARE 2 n NUMBER; 3 BEGIN 4 FOR n IN 1..100 5 LOOP 6 INSERT INTO bigtab SELECT rownum as "id", a.* FROM dba_objects a; 7 COMMIT; 8 END LOOP; 9 END;/PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.这里创建一张大表和一张小表,并且都没有索引,下面执行一个查询:
SQL> set timing onSQL> set autot onSQL> select count(*) from bigtab a, smalltab b where a.object_name=b.table_name;COUNT(*)----------135000Elapsed: 00:00:05.59Execution Plan----------------------------------------------------------Plan hash value: 3089226980--------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 36 | 3550 (2)| 00:00:43 || 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 36 | | ||* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 155K| 5462K| 3550 (2)| 00:00:43 || 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SMALLTAB | 1223 | 22014 | 11 (0)| 00:00:01 || 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| BIGTAB | 1205K| 20M| 3526 (1)| 00:00:43 |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Predicate Information (identified by operation id):---------------------------------------------------2 - access("A"."OBJECT_NAME"="B"."TABLE_NAME")Statistics----------------------------------------------------------0 recursive calls0 db block gets16013 consistent gets14491 physical reads0 redo size412 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client385 bytes received via SQL*Net from client2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client0 sorts (memory)0 sorts (disk)1 rows processed可以看出这个语句执行性能很差:16013 consistent gets。
第一步:创建优化任务并执行
通过调用函数CREATE_TUNING_TASK来创建优化任务,调用存储过程EXECUTE_TUNING_TASK执行该任务:
SQL> set autot offSQL> set timing offSQL> DECLARE2 my_task_name VARCHAR2(30);3 my_sqltext CLOB;4 BEGIN5 my_sqltext := 'select count(*) from bigtab a, smalltab b where a.object_name=b.table_name';6 my_task_name := DBMS_SQLTUNE.CREATE_TUNING_TASK(7 sql_text => my_sqltext,8 user_name => 'DEMO',9 scope => 'COMPREHENSIVE',10 time_limit => 60,11 task_name => 'tuning_sql_test',12 description => 'Task to tune a query on a specified table');1314 DBMS_SQLTUNE.EXECUTE_TUNING_TASK( task_name => 'tuning_sql_test');15 END;16 /PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.在函数CREATE_TUNING_TASK,sql_text是需要优化的语句,user_name是该语句通过哪个用户执行,scope是优化范围(limited或comprehensive),time_limit优化过程的时间限制,task_name优化任务名称,description优化任务描述。
可以通过视图USER_ADVISOR_LOG和USER_ADVISOR_LOG来查看创建过的优化任务。
SQL> select task_name, status from USER_ADVISOR_LOG where task_name='tuning_sql_test';TASK_NAME STATUS------------------------------ -----------tuning_sql_test COMPLETED第二步:查看优化结果
通过函数可以查看优化结果。
SQL> set long 10000SQL> set longchunksize 1000SQL> set linesize 100SQL> SELECT DBMS_SQLTUNE.REPORT_TUNING_TASK( 'tuning_sql_test') from DUAL;DBMS_SQLTUNE.REPORT_TUNING_TASK('TUNING_SQL_TEST')----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------GENERAL INFORMATION SECTION-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tuning Task Name : tuning_sql_testTuning Task Owner : DEMOScope : COMPREHENSIVETime Limit(seconds) : 60Completion Status : COMPLETEDStarted at : 11/30/2005 13:16:43Completed at : 11/30/2005 13:16:44Number of Index Findings : 1Schema Name: DEMOSQL ID : 6p64dnnsqf9pmSQL Text : select count(*) from bigtab a, smalltab b wherea.object_name=b.table_name-------------------------------------------------------------------------------FINDINGS SECTION (1 finding)-------------------------------------------------------------------------------1- Index Finding (see explain plans section below)The execution plan of this statement can be improved by creating one or moreindices.Recommendation (estimated benefit: 100%)----------------------------------------- Consider running the Access Advisor to improve the physical schema designor creating the recommended index.create index DEMO.IDX$$_06C50001 on DEMO.SMALLTAB('TABLE_NAME');- Consider running the Access Advisor to improve the physical schema designor creating the recommended index.create index DEMO.IDX$$_06C50002 on DEMO.BIGTAB('OBJECT_NAME');Rationale---------Creating the recommended indices significantly improves the execution planof this statement. However, it might be preferable to run "Access Advisor"using a representative SQL workload as opposed to a single statement. Thiswill allow to get comprehensive index recommendations which takes intoaccount index maintenance overhead and additional space consumption.EXPLAIN PLANS SECTION-------------------------------------------------------------------------------1- Original-----------Plan hash value: 3089226980--------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 36 | 3550 (2)| 00:00:43 || 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 36 | | ||* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 155K| 5462K| 3550 (2)| 00:00:43 || 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SMALLTAB | 1223 | 22014 | 11 (0)| 00:00:01 || 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| BIGTAB | 1205K| 20M| 3526 (1)| 00:00:43 |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Predicate Information (identified by operation id):---------------------------------------------------2 - access("A"."OBJECT_NAME"="B"."TABLE_NAME")2- Using New Indices--------------------Plan hash value: 494801882-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 36 | 1108 (3)| 00:00:14 || 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 36 | | ||* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 155K| 5462K| 1108 (3)| 00:00:14 || 3 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IDX$$_06C50001 | 1223 | 22014 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 || 4 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IDX$$_06C50002 | 1205K| 20M| 1093 (2)| 00:00:14 |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Predicate Information (identified by operation id):---------------------------------------------------2 - access("A"."OBJECT_NAME"="B"."TABLE_NAME")-------------------------------------------------------------------------------看一下这个优化建议报告:
第一部分是关于这次优化任务的基本信息:如任务名称、执行时间、范围、涉及到的语句等等。
第二部分是关于这次优化任务的所找到的问题以及给出的优化建议。前面先给出了问题描述:可以通过建立更多的所引来提高性能;然后是建议的具体内容:在表smalltab的字段table_name上创建索引,在表bigtab的字段object_name上创建索引;最后是相关注意事项:此次优化虽然给出了创建索引的建议,但是最好通过SQL访问建议器(SQL Access Advisor SAA)结合整个数据库的工作量来深入分析,那样就能给出考虑了索引维护和空间消耗等因素的更加合理的建议。
最后,报告还给出了原有的查询计划,以及采用优化建议以后的查询计划的对比。可以看出COST值大大下降。